RESUMO
Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is one of the commonly preferred regional anesthesia techniques in the recent past for various procedures including spine surgeries. The main advantages of ESPB are the ease of performing the technique and the lesser chance of complications. Many studies have proven that ESPB plays an important role in reducing perioperative opioid consumption, postoperative nausea and vomiting, as well as the length of stay in the hospital. Thus it has been adopted as one of the measures for the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol. Nevertheless, the role of bi-level ESPB and a continuous catheter technique are the major research gaps and thus require further research in this population. The details of these two methods are discussed elaborately here.
RESUMO
Background Surgical transverse abdominis plane (TAP) block has been studied in various surgeries. However, its role particularly in the form of continuous infusion in comparison to epidural infusion in open gynecological surgeries remains unknown. Hence, this study was taken up. Methodology Sixty patients were assigned to either of the two groups: continuous epidural (Group E) or continuous infusion in the surgical TAP (Group S). The primary outcomes were visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores and rescue analgesic requirements. Postoperative complications such as nausea/vomiting, hypotension, and bradycardia were also assessed. Results Mean pain scores were significantly lesser in Group E. However, 80% (24) of Group E and 50% (15) of Group S did not require rescue analgesia, which was not statistically significant. Adverse effects did not differ significantly between the two groups. Conclusions The efficacy of the continuous surgical TAP block is similar to a continuous epidural. Therefore, it can be considered in settings with limited resources and expertise or in cases of contraindications for an epidural.
RESUMO
Background and objective The role of the pre-peritoneal infiltration of local anesthetic (PILA) in laparoscopic hernia repair has been equivocal. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block has been extensively studied. However, studies comparing these two methods are very scarce. Hence, this study was undertaken to compare the efficacy of pre-peritoneal plus portal infiltration with TAP block in this population. Materials and methods This double-blinded randomized comparative study was conducted on a total of 32 patients by allotting 16 patients in each group. Group A patients were given pre-peritoneal plus portal infiltration of 15 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine for each technique by the operating surgeon, while Group B patients were administered bilateral TAP block with 0.5% ropivacaine, 15 mL on each side under ultrasound guidance by the anesthesiologist. Results The demographic variables and duration of surgery were comparable between the two groups. Also, the postoperative requirement of fentanyl between the two groups was insignificant. However, the duration of anesthesia was significantly longer in Group B attributing to the extra time taken for the administration of the TAP blocks. Conclusion Both ultrasound-guided TAP block and the PILA plus portal infiltration are effective techniques for pain relief after laparoscopic hernia repair. Either of these two techniques can be chosen depending on the availability of resources, expertise, etc.
